Sunday, November 12, 2017

Unmanned System Data Protocol and Format: DJI Inspire 2

Commercial unmanned aerial systems (UAS) available to consumers vary greatly in size and capability. Purpose built systems are offered by producers for a variety of missions. For aerial photography and cinematography, Dà-Jiāng Innovations Science and Technology Co., Ltd (DJI) has established itself as an industry leader in small UAS (sUAS). The technology firm offers a range of options for aerial camera drones that span from those appropriate for amateur users to professionals. One of their most capable and well-rounded platforms is the Inspire 2 filmmaking drone.

The Inspire 2 (see Figure 1) is an sUAS designed with professional photography and cinematography in mind. The aircraft design form is an electrically powered quadcopter. The drone is satellite navigation enabled, has an obstacle avoidance system, and can function with a high degree of autonomy or can be configured to use two remote controls; one pilot and one camera operator. At first glance, the system looks very similar to the previous iteration. There have been many changes, however, that have contributed to evolve it to a more capable and safe aerial cinematography sUAS.

Figure 1. DJI Inspire 2 with Zenmuse X5S Camera image as published on https://www.dji.com/inspire-2/info

Perhaps the most innovative advances on the platform lie in the cameras and data storage system. The drone incorporates a first-person view (FPV) camera for the streaming video to the pilot, as well as a customizable primary camera payload. The highest resolution camera compatible with the platform is the Zenmuse X7 (see Figure 2). The camera features a Super 35 sensor, and is able to shoot 6K video and 24-megapixel still photography (Zenmuse X7, 2017). Its 24-megapixel sensor is rated at 14 stops of dynamic range and can collect continuous RAW images in burst shooting at a rate of 20 frames per second (Zenmuse X7, 2017). The lenses can be changed to meet the photography or cinematography needs. DJI offers four specifically designed for the image sensor; 16mm F2.8, 24mm F2.8, 35mm F2.8, and 50mm F2.8 (Zenmuse X7, 2017).

Figure 2. DJI Zenmuse X7 Camera image as published on http://www.dji.com/zenmuse-x7/info#specs

To manage the high-resolution imagery, the camera integrates with the CineCore 2.1 Image Processing System (Esulto, 2017). The system records in two formats; CinemaDNG and Apple ProRes (Zenmuse X7, 2017). Both formats allow for compression of very high-resolution image files. Though not as condensed as other formats, the reason for using them is the ability to maintain a high dynamic range and overall better image quality. The drawback is a very notable increase in file size.

The increased file size is an issue that had to be addressed for the Inspire 2. Data storage is a challenge with the size of files for high-resolution imagery. The aircraft does use the industry standard of Micro-SD cards, but for greater demand, DJI has introduced the use of optional solid-state drives (SSD) (Inspire 2, 2017). The use of a SSD, CINESSD as it is called by DJI, allows operators to collect video footage at the camera’s highest resolution. DJI offers CINESSD drives in sizes ranges from 120GB to 480GB. Filming video the highest quality video requires a generous amount of storage space. For this application, quality takes precedence over compression.


Until another data format is developed that will allow for high-resolution imagery to be compressed without degradation of quality, the current alternatives should be expected to remain the standard. We have seen image processing on platforms move from the camera to the vehicle, allowing for increasingly capable cameras to be fitted to the gimbal mount and yet maintain smaller form factor. I see the most notable changes in the near future to this platform to be in data storage. The CINESSD is a step in the right direction, but even the largest drive available has its limitation when shooting in the highest resolution. I recommend DJI continue to develop storage technology to meet the demands of today’s high-end camera systems. This may be achievable with next generation SSD technology like that used in Intel and Micron Technology’s 3D XPoint.

Sunday, November 5, 2017

UAS Sensor Placement

The field of unmanned aviation has expanded rapidly over the last two decades. Small unmanned aerial systems (sUAS) are the largest segment of unmanned aviation, and arguably unmanned systems in general, and their exponential growth has contributed to a blossoming hobbyist and commercial market. With so many choices on platforms, where does a new unmanned pilot start when searching for a suitable aircraft. There are certainly many uses for sUAS, so addressing all wouldn’t be feasible with a single paper. This work will focus on two of the most common uses for sUAS and offer suggestions for viable platforms.

The first use examined will be from the commercial side of unmanned aviation. From the onset of unmanned system use in aviation unmanned aerial systems (UAS) have been used in large part for remote imagery platforms. UAS have served the military well as intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance (ISR) platforms, so it’s no surprise operators saw value in aerial imagery collection for commercial use. Aerial photography/videography is a very popular use for commercial sUAS operators. There is a litany of unmanned systems commercially available, many of which are capable aerial camera platforms, making selecting platform a challenge.

A proven industry leader in sUAS is DJI. The firm produces high quality aerial photography drones. The Phantom 4 Pro (see Figure 1) is one of their commercially available platforms that strikes a good balance of aerial film making ability and modest price. The sUAS is a satellite navigation equipped quadrotor multi-copter capable of a high level of autonomous function (Phantom 4 Pro, 2017). The aircraft has an integrated 5-direction obstacle sensing system and is designed for 4-direction obstacle avoidance (Phantom 4 Pro, 2017). The key feature of the system, however, is the camera. The three-axis, gimbal mounted camera utilizes a 1-inch 20-megapixel complementary metal oxide semiconductor (CMOS) sensor and is capable of filming in 4K resolution at a rate of 60 frames per second as well as taking still photographs at 20-megapixels (Phantom 4 Pro, 2017). DJI’s positioning of the camera below the body allows for unrestricted view of the subject and the gimbal allows to camera to shoot smooth and stable photos and video.


Figure 1. DJI Phantom 4 Pro image as http://store.dji.com/product/phantom-4-pro?site=brandsite

The impressive gimbal stabilized camera system of the drone is what makes it an ideal choice for commercial aerial photography and film making. Airworthiness, ease of operation, and relatively low acquisition cost all serve to solidify this choice. At a suggested retail price of $1499, the system is a reasonably priced and capable commercial sUAS (Phantom 4 Pro, 2017).

The next use examined is from the hobbyist side. Hobbyist unmanned aviation is more established than its commercial counterpart. The hobby stems from remote controlled aircraft of various types. A rapidly growing segment, however, is drone racing. With several classes and ability levels, selecting a suitable platform can also be difficult. Systems are very customizable and can be adjusted to suit the operators liking. Racing drones are small in comparison to most aerial photography sUAS and are purpose built to be fast and agile. Racers fly their multi-copter through a course of obstacles utilizing first-person view (FPV). Classes are based mainly on the size of battery cell used to power the aircraft, 250mW being the most common and a great place to start.

A lead hobby sUAS producer, Walkera, offers drone racing kits for every class of competition. Walkera offers several 250 class options with the Runner 250 PRO (see Figure 2) topping the list in ability. The quadrotor platform features a lightweight 464g aircraft (battery excluded) with a 143mm rotor diameter (Runner 250 Pro, 2017). The system uses quality electronic components and brushless motors. The integrated camera on the aircraft is high definition, 800 Television Lines (TVL) resolution sensor, optimized to transmit video at 5.8GHz (Runner 250 Pro, 2017). The forward and centerline placement of the camera allows for an unobstructed first-person view from the platform. The adjustable tilt allows for compensation for nose low attitudes required for high speed flight.


Figure 2. Walker Runner 250 PRO image as http://www.walkera.com/index.php/Goods/info/id/43.html

Light weight, solid build, good components, and a camera system designed for FPV use contribute to making the Runner 250 PRO a very viable FPV racing drone.

Both the sUAS mentioned are prime examples of how unmanned system designers tailor build these aircraft for their intended use. DJI designs drones to be employed as aerial cameras, while Walkera is focusing on the very unique need of hobbyist FPV racers. The applications for drones continue to grow, and the commercial drone market will most assuredly follow that trend.



References

Phantom 4 Pro. (2017). DJI. Retrieved from https://www.dji.com/phantom-4-pro

Runner 250 Pro. (2017). Walkera. Retrieved from http://www.walkera.com/index.php/Goods/info/id/43.html



Figure



Case Analysis Effectiveness

Communicating the detailed points of an area of study can be a challenging task. Developing sound methods and collecting research data fo...